Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs EPYC 9375F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9375F
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
54.65
+0.4%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025
24 cores / 48 threads, 350 Watt
54.41

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.2418.82
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.196.55
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)Shimada Peak (2025)
Release date10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)23 July 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,306$2,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX has 128% better value for money than EPYC 9375F.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6448
Base clock speed3.85 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size8x 70.6 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors66,520 million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128136

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 9375F 54.65
+0.4%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 54.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 9375F 95768
+0.4%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 95346

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.65 54.41
Recency 10 October 2024 23 July 2025
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 48
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 9375F has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 9.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD EPYC 9375F and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.