Ryzen Threadripper 7980X vs EPYC 9374F

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9374F
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
51.21
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
2023
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
86.11
+68.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X outperforms EPYC 9374F by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.9411.15
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.8622.85
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,850$4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X has 61% better value for money than EPYC 9374F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed3.85 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.85 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier38.5no data
L1 cache2 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size8x 72 mm28x 71 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9374F 51.21
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X 86.11
+68.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9374F 79826
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X 134223
+68.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.21 86.11
Recency 10 November 2022 19 October 2023
Physical cores 32 64
Threads 64 128
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 9374F has 9.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X, on the other hand, has a 68.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9374F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9374F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9374F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 42 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 7980X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9374F or Ryzen Threadripper 7980X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.