Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U vs EPYC 9374F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9374F
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
51.61
+313%
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
12.49

EPYC 9374F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U by a whopping 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking29576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.138.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameGenoaHawk Point
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,850no data
Current price$3495 (0.7x MSRP)$1119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9374F has 59% better value for money than Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads6412
Base clock speed3.85 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm4 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2137 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FP7
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes12814

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9374F 51.61
+313%
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U 12.49

EPYC 9374F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U by 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 9374F 79826
+313%
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U 19316

EPYC 9374F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U by 313% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.61 12.49
Recency 10 November 2022 16 April 2024
Physical cores 32 6
Threads 64 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 28 Watt

The EPYC 9374F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9374F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9374F or Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.