Xeon 6369P vs EPYC 9354P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9354P
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
46.62
+153%
Xeon 6369P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.46

EPYC 9354P outperforms Xeon 6369P by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking51373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.2477.06
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency16.0518.73
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,730$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6369P has 406% better value for money than EPYC 9354P.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9354P and Xeon 6369P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed3.25 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.7 GHz
Multiplier32.5no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm10 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2257 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9354P and Xeon 6369P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP51700
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9354P and Xeon 6369P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9354P and Xeon 6369P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9354P and Xeon 6369P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9354P and Xeon 6369P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9354P and Xeon 6369P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 9354P 46.62
+153%
Xeon 6369P 18.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 9354P 74960
+153%
Xeon 6369P 29680

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.62 18.46
Recency 10 November 2022 24 February 2025
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 95 Watt

EPYC 9354P has a 152.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 6369P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 194.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 9354P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6369P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9354P
EPYC 9354P
Intel Xeon 6369P
Xeon 6369P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9354P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6369P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9354P and Xeon 6369P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.