Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs EPYC 9354P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9354P outperforms Apple M3 Max 16-Core by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 46 | 211 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 15.19 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Apple M3 |
| Power efficiency | 16.01 | 31.49 |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | no data |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,730 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9354P and M3 Max 16-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.25 GHz | 2.748 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 8x 72 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | 92000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9354P and M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 78 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9354P and M3 Max 16-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9354P and M3 Max 16-Core are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9354P and M3 Max 16-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9354P and M3 Max 16-Core.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 46.89 | 25.69 |
| Recency | 10 November 2022 | 30 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 16 |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 78 Watt |
EPYC 9354P has a 82.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 259% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 9354P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Max 16-Core in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 9354P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
