EPYC 9845 vs EPYC 9354

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.97no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.44no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Turin (2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,420$13,564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)160
Threads64320
Base clock speed3.25 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.25 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier32.5no data
L1 cache2 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm3 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2no data
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2022 10 October 2024
Physical cores 32 160
Threads 64 320
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 390 Watt

EPYC 9354 has 39.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9354
EPYC 9354
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9354 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9354 or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.