Ryzen Embedded 7745 vs EPYC 9275F
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 48 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.49 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 6.36 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 14 November 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,439 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9275F and Ryzen Embedded 7745 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 8x 70.6 mm2 | 71 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 66,520 million | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9275F and Ryzen Embedded 7745 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9275F and Ryzen Embedded 7745. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9275F and Ryzen Embedded 7745 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9275F and Ryzen Embedded 7745. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9275F and Ryzen Embedded 7745.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 14 November 2023 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 8 |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC 9275F has an age advantage of 10 months, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Embedded 7745, on the other hand, has 392.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9275F and AMD Ryzen Embedded 7745. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded 7745 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
