Ryzen 9 7940HX vs EPYC 9274F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
47.50
+36.8%
Ryzen 9 7940HX
2024
16 cores / 3216 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4 threads, 55 Watt
34.72

EPYC 9274F outperforms Ryzen 9 7940HX by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 7940HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.71no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
Architecture codenameGenoaDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,060no data
Current price$2995 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 7940HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads483216 x 5.2  GHz AMD Zen 4
Base clock speed4.05 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors52,560 million9900 Million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 7940HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5FL1
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 7940HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 7940HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 7940HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 7940HX.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9274F 47.50
+36.8%
Ryzen 9 7940HX 34.72

EPYC 9274F outperforms Ryzen 9 7940HX by 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 9274F 73463
+36.8%
Ryzen 9 7940HX 53704

EPYC 9274F outperforms Ryzen 9 7940HX by 37% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.50 34.72
Recency 10 November 2022 17 January 2024
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 3216 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 55 Watt

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7940HX in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9274F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7940HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 7940HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
Ryzen 9 7940HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9274F or Ryzen 9 7940HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.