Ryzen 7 7800X vs EPYC 9274F
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 42 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 12.05 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 13.70 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | Zen 4 |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,060 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4.05 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.05 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1536 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 96 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 8x 72 mm2 | 71+122 mm |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 24 | 8 |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 120 Watt |
EPYC 9274F has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Ryzen 7 7800X, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9274F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7800X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 7 7800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
