Xeon w5-2545 vs EPYC 9254

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9254
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
40.80
+55.5%
Xeon w5-2545
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 210 Watt
26.24

EPYC 9254 outperforms Xeon w5-2545 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking63188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.8683.24
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.2911.82
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299$889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w5-2545 has 425% better value for money than EPYC 9254.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data12
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.15 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 72 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors26,280 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9254 40.80
+55.5%
Xeon w5-2545 26.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9254 64815
+55.5%
Xeon w5-2545 41688

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.80 26.24
Recency 10 November 2022 24 August 2024
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 210 Watt

EPYC 9254 has a 55.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 5% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-2545, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The EPYC 9254 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w5-2545 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9254 and Xeon w5-2545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9254
EPYC 9254
Intel Xeon w5-2545
Xeon w5-2545

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate EPYC 9254 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon w5-2545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9254 or Xeon w5-2545, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.