EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9254

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 9254
2022
24 cores / 48 threads
44.60

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 9254 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9254 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.8610.12
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameGenoaGenoa
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299$11,805
Current price$2478 (1.1x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9254 has 76% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9254 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)96
Threads48192
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.15 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 72 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors26,280 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9254 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9254 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9254 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9254 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9254 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9254 44.60
EPYC 9654 78.98
+77.1%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 9254 by 77% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 9254 68988
EPYC 9654 122155
+77.1%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 9254 by 77% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.60 78.98
Physical cores 24 96
Threads 48 192
Cost $2299 $11805
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9254 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9254 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9254
EPYC 9254
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9254 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 982 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9254 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.