EPYC 8224P vs EPYC 9254

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9254
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
44.10
+49.7%

EPYC 9254 outperforms EPYC 8224P by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9254 and EPYC 8224P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.1729.20
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency20.0716.76
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Siena (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299$855

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8224P has 81% better value for money than EPYC 9254.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9254 and EPYC 8224P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.55 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache1536 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size4x 72 mm22x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors26,280 million17,750 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9254 and EPYC 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5SP6
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9254 and EPYC 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9254 and EPYC 8224P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9254 and EPYC 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9254 and EPYC 8224P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12896

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9254 44.10
+49.7%
EPYC 8224P 29.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9254 67343
+49.7%
EPYC 8224P 44990

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.10 29.46
Recency 10 November 2022 18 September 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 160 Watt

EPYC 9254 has a 49.7% higher aggregate performance score.

EPYC 8224P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 25% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9254 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 8224P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9254 and EPYC 8224P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9254
EPYC 9254
AMD EPYC 8224P
EPYC 8224P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9254 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9254 or EPYC 8224P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.