Processor CC150 vs EPYC 9175F
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 92 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.83 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 4.92 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,256 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9175F and Processor CC150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 512 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 16x 70.6 mm2 | 180.3 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 133,040 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9175F and Processor CC150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9175F and Processor CC150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9175F and Processor CC150 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9175F and Processor CC150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9175F and Processor CC150.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 95 Watt |
EPYC 9175F has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
Processor CC150, on the other hand, has 236.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9175F and Intel Processor CC150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation processor while Processor CC150 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
