Ryzen Threadripper 7960X vs EPYC 9174F

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
35.98
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 350 Watt
53.88
+49.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X outperforms EPYC 9174F by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9174F and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9927
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.39no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9174F and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed4.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier41no data
L1 cache1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size8x 72 mm24x 71 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9174F and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9174F 35.98
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 53.88
+49.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9174F 55485
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 83077
+49.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.98 53.88
Recency 10 November 2022 19 October 2023
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 9174F has 9.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X, on the other hand, has a 49.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Ryzen Threadripper 7960X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9174F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 7960X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9174F and Ryzen Threadripper 7960X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 40 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 7960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9174F or Ryzen Threadripper 7960X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.