Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs EPYC 9174F
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 9950X3D outperforms EPYC 9174F by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 9174F and Ryzen 9 9950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 119 | 55 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.20 | 64.19 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.29 | 24.34 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,850 | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D has 792% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9174F and Ryzen 9 9950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 41 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 8x 72 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9174F and Ryzen 9 9950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen 9 9950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen 9 9950X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen 9 9950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and Ryzen 9 9950X3D.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 34.59 | 43.45 |
| Recency | 10 November 2022 | 6 January 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 170 Watt |
Ryzen 9 9950X3D has a 25.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 88.2% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 9174F in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
