EPYC 9274F vs EPYC 9174F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9174F
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 320 Watt
35.87
EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
47.50
+32.4%

EPYC 9274F outperforms EPYC 9174F by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9274F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8734
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.1014.43
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameGenoaGenoa
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,850$3,060
Current price$2950 (0.8x MSRP)$2995 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9274F has 30% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9274F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed4.1 GHz4.05 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 72 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9274F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9274F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9274F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9274F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9274F.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9174F 35.87
EPYC 9274F 47.50
+32.4%

EPYC 9274F outperforms EPYC 9174F by 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 9174F 55485
EPYC 9274F 73463
+32.4%

EPYC 9274F outperforms EPYC 9174F by 32% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.87 47.50
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Cost $3850 $3060

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9174F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9174F and EPYC 9274F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F
AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9174F or EPYC 9274F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.