Ryzen 7 249 vs EPYC 9135
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9135 outperforms Ryzen 7 249 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 183 | 537 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.70 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 6.87 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024−2025) | Hawk Point-H (Zen 4) (2024−2026) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 2 June 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,214 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 9135 and Ryzen 7 249: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.65 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16,630 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9135 and Ryzen 7 249 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP5 | FP7r2/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9135 and Ryzen 7 249. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9135 and Ryzen 7 249 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9135 and Ryzen 7 249. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9135 and Ryzen 7 249.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.18 | 16.66 |
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 2 June 2026 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
EPYC 9135 has a 99% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 7 249, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
The AMD EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 249 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 249 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
