i3-1115G4 (IPU) vs EPYC 9124
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 269 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.89 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.22 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) | 2 September 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,083 | $281 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9124 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 4x 72 mm2 | 144 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 26,280 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9124 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | Intel BGA 1449 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9124 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9124 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9124 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR4, LPDDR4X |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Iris Xe-LP Graphics G4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9124 and Core i3-1115G4 (IPU).
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 November 2022 | 2 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 9124 has an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
i3-1115G4 (IPU), on the other hand, has 1233% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9124 and Intel Core i3-1115G4 (IPU). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9124 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-1115G4 (IPU) is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
