Athlon 1000 (C) vs EPYC 9015

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)Thunderbird C (2000−2001)
Release date10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)31 October 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$527$385

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9015 and Athlon 1000 (C) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nm180 nm
Die size2x 70.6 mm2120 mm2
Number of transistors16,630 million37 million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9015 and Athlon 1000 (C) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5A
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9015 and Athlon 1000 (C). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9015 and Athlon 1000 (C) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9015 and Athlon 1000 (C). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR1 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9015 and Athlon 1000 (C).

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2024 31 October 2000
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 4 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 54 Watt

EPYC 9015 has an age advantage of 23 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1000 (C), on the other hand, has 131.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9015 and AMD Athlon 1000 (C). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9015 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 1000 (C) is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9015
EPYC 9015
AMD Athlon 1000 (C)
Athlon 1000 (C)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9015 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon 1000 (C) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9015 and Athlon 1000 (C), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.