UHD Graphics 605 vs EPYC 8534P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking83not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.93no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Power efficiency21.87no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Gen9.5
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$4,950no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8534P and UHD Graphics 605 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)no data
Threads128no data
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz0.25 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size4x 73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8534P and UHD Graphics 605 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP6no data
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8534P and UHD Graphics 605. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8534P and UHD Graphics 605 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8534P and UHD Graphics 605. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8,192 MB 8,388,608 KB 8,589,934,592 B 0.00781 TiB 8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8534P and UHD Graphics 605.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes96no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

EPYC 8534P has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8534P and Intel UHD Graphics 605. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 8534P is a server/workstation processor while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8534P
EPYC 8534P
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8534P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 37 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8534P and UHD Graphics 605, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.