i5-13600KF vs EPYC 8534P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8534P
2023
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
40.91
+91.9%
Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
21.32

EPYC 8534P outperforms Core i5-13600KF by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking74301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.9068.05
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency8.654.98
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)27 September 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,950$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13600KF has 886% better value for money than EPYC 8534P.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8534P and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads12820
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C72 °C
Number of transistors35,500 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8534P and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8534P and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 8534P and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8534P and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8534P and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8534P and Core i5-13600KF.

PCIe version5.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes9620

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8534P 40.91
+91.9%
i5-13600KF 21.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8534P 71900
+91.9%
Samples: 14
i5-13600KF 37473
Samples: 3535

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.91 21.32
Recency 18 September 2023 27 September 2022
Physical cores 64 14
Threads 128 20
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 8534P has a 91.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 357.1% more physical cores and 540% more threads.

i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 8534P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i5-13600KF in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8534P is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8534P
EPYC 8534P
Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8534P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2369 votes

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8534P and Core i5-13600KF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.