Celeron M 370 vs EPYC 8534P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8534P outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 29036% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 83 | 3599 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.93 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 21.87 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,950 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8534P and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 4x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 35,500 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8534P and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP6 | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8534P and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 8534P and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8534P and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8534P and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8534P and Celeron M 370.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 40.79 | 0.14 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 1 |
| Threads | 128 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 21 Watt |
EPYC 8534P has a 29035.7% higher aggregate performance score, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 370, on the other hand, has 852.4% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 8534P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 370 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 8534P is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 370 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
