Athlon II X4 605e vs EPYC 8534P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8534P
2023
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
40.76
+3572%

EPYC 8534P outperforms Athlon II X4 605e by a whopping 3572% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking682533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.910.18
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.641.05
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)20 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,950$102

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8534P has 3739% better value for money than Athlon II X4 605e.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8534P and Athlon II X4 605e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm45 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2169 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8534P and Athlon II X4 605e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6AM3
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8534P and Athlon II X4 605e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8534P and Athlon II X4 605e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8534P and Athlon II X4 605e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8534P and Athlon II X4 605e.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes96no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8534P 40.76
+3572%
Athlon II X4 605e 1.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8534P 71900
+3561%
Athlon II X4 605e 1964

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.76 1.11
Recency 18 September 2023 20 October 2009
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 8534P has a 3572.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II X4 605e, on the other hand, has 344.4% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 8534P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II X4 605e in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8534P is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X4 605e is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8534P
EPYC 8534P
AMD Athlon II X4 605e
Athlon II X4 605e

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8534P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 18 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 605e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8534P and Athlon II X4 605e, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.