PRO A6-9500E vs EPYC 8434P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8434P
2023, $2,700
48 cores / 96 threads, 200 Watt
37.63
+3820%

EPYC 8434P outperforms PRO A6-9500E by a whopping 3820% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking992713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.45no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency20.222.95
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)3 October 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,700no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads962
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm28 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 million3,100 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6AM4
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes968

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8434P 37.63
+3820%
PRO A6-9500E 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8434P 66490
+3837%
Samples: 11
PRO A6-9500E 1689
Samples: 17

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.63 0.96
Recency 18 September 2023 3 October 2016
Physical cores 48 2
Threads 96 2
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 8434P has a 3819.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

PRO A6-9500E, on the other hand, has 471.4% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 8434P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD PRO A6-9500E in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8434P is a server/workstation processor while PRO A6-9500E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8434P
EPYC 8434P
AMD PRO A6-9500E
PRO A6-9500E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PRO A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8434P and PRO A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.