Atom x3-C3200RK vs EPYC 8434P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking99not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.43no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data3x Intel Atom
Power efficiency20.22no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Silvermont (2015)
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)4 March 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,700no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads964
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm28 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP6no data
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
GPIOno data4 x I2C
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data4.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data1
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDPno dataup to 1920x1080
Max refresh rateno data60 Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

OpenGLno dataES 2.0

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes96no data
USB revisionno data2.0 OTG
Number of USB portsno data1
UARTno data2 x USIF configurable

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2023 4 March 2015
Physical cores 48 4
Threads 96 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

EPYC 8434P has an age advantage of 8 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8434P and Intel Atom x3-C3200RK. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 8434P is a server/workstation processor while Atom x3-C3200RK is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8434P
EPYC 8434P
Intel Atom x3-C3200RK
Atom x3-C3200RK

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 3 votes

Rate Atom x3-C3200RK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8434P and Atom x3-C3200RK, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.