Ryzen 3 8300G vs EPYC 8324PN

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8324PN
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 130 Watt
5.22
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.96
+71.6%

Ryzen 3 8300G outperforms EPYC 8324PN by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1298946
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4833.18
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.8513.22
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,125$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 8300G has 2142% better value for money than EPYC 8324PN.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.05 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2137 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 million20,900 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6AM5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes9614

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8324PN 5.22
Ryzen 3 8300G 8.96
+71.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8324PN 8375
Ryzen 3 8300G 14374
+71.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.22 8.96
Recency 18 September 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 8324PN has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has a 71.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 3 8300G is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 8324PN in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8324PN is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8324PN
EPYC 8324PN
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324PN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8324PN and Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.