Xeon E7310 vs EPYC 8224P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 250 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 30.72 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 6.84 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | no data |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 July 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $855 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8224P and Xeon E7310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 48 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 4 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 2x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 66 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,750 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8224P and Xeon E7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP6 | PGA604,PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and Xeon E7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 8224P and Xeon E7310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and Xeon E7310 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and Xeon E7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and Xeon E7310.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 1 July 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 80 Watt |
EPYC 8224P has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon E7310, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8224P and Intel Xeon E7310. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
