Ryzen Threadripper 1998 vs EPYC 8224P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 252 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 30.72 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 6.84 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $855 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper 1998: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,750 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP6 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 0 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper 1998 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper 1998. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper 1998.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 24 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
EPYC 8224P has 50% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8224P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1998. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 8224P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1998 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
