Ryzen 7 5800H vs EPYC 8224P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
28.15
+116%
Ryzen 7 5800H
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 54 Watt
13.04

EPYC 8224P outperforms Ryzen 7 5800H by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking185609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.82no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency16.8423.12
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$855no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 5800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.55 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 5800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 5800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 5800H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 5800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 5800H.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes96no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8224P 28.15
+116%
Ryzen 7 5800H 13.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8224P 45160
+116%
Ryzen 7 5800H 20915

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.15 13.04
Recency 18 September 2023 12 January 2021
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 54 Watt

EPYC 8224P has a 115.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 5800H, on the other hand, has 196.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 8224P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8224P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 5800H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8224P
EPYC 8224P
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Ryzen 7 5800H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4355 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 5800H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.