Ryzen 7 170 vs EPYC 8224P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 235 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 30.61 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 6.83 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 October 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $855 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.75 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 2x 73 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,750 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP6 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 170 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 680M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and Ryzen 7 170.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 1 October 2025 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 8 |
| Threads | 48 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC 8224P has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 7 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 357.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8224P and AMD Ryzen 7 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 8224P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 170 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
