EPYC 7451 vs EPYC 8224P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
28.54
+74.7%
EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.34

EPYC 8224P outperforms EPYC 7451 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8224P and EPYC 7451 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking161404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.931.73
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.818.55
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)20 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$855$2,400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8224P has 1514% better value for money than EPYC 7451.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8224P and EPYC 7451 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.55 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2.25 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2213 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 million19200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8224P and EPYC 7451 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP6TR4
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and EPYC 7451. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and EPYC 7451 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and EPYC 7451. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and EPYC 7451.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes96128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 8224P 28.54
+74.7%
EPYC 7451 16.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 8224P 45160
+74.6%
EPYC 7451 25863

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.54 16.34
Recency 18 September 2023 20 June 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 180 Watt

EPYC 8224P has a 74.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 12.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 8224P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7451 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8224P and EPYC 7451, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8224P
EPYC 8224P
AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 8224P or EPYC 7451, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.