i7-1068G7 vs EPYC 8224P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8224P outperforms Core i7-1068G7 by a whopping 438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 246 | 1440 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 30.72 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Power efficiency | 6.84 | 7.27 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $855 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8224P and Core i7-1068G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | OPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 23 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 2x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 17,750 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8224P and Core i7-1068G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP6 | Intel BGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-1068G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-1068G7 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-1068G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 59.732 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and Core i7-1068G7.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.93 | 4.82 |
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 1 August 2019 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 4 |
| Threads | 48 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 28 Watt |
EPYC 8224P has a 438% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
i7-1068G7, on the other hand, has 471.4% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 8224P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-1068G7 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 8224P is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-1068G7 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
