A10-6800K vs EPYC 8224P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
25.85
+1328%

EPYC 8224P outperforms A10-6800K by a whopping 1328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2252144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.520.34
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency6.820.76
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)1 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$855$142

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8224P has 8876% better value for money than A10-6800K.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2.55 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C74 °C
Number of transistors17,750 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6FM2
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 8670D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes96no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8224P 25.85
+1328%
A10-6800K 1.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8224P Samples: 13 45421
+1326%
A10-6800K Samples: 1027 3186

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.85 1.81
Recency 18 September 2023 1 June 2013
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 100 Watt

EPYC 8224P has a 1328.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

A10-6800K, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 8224P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-6800K in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8224P is a server/workstation processor while A10-6800K is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8224P
EPYC 8224P
AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 481 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8224P and A10-6800K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.