Xeon w3-2535 vs EPYC 8124P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8124P
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
22.65
+0.4%
Xeon w3-2535
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 185 Watt
22.55

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking265267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.5983.58
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency17.3811.69
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$639$739

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w3-2535 has 182% better value for money than EPYC 8124P.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8124P and Xeon w3-2535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-coresno data10
Threads3220
Base clock speed2.45 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)26.25 MB
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C74 °C
Number of transistors17,750 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8124P and Xeon w3-2535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8124P and Xeon w3-2535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 8124P and Xeon w3-2535 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8124P and Xeon w3-2535 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8124P and Xeon w3-2535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8124P and Xeon w3-2535.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8124P 22.65
+0.4%
Xeon w3-2535 22.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8124P 36338
+0.4%
Xeon w3-2535 36181

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.65 22.55
Recency 18 September 2023 24 August 2024
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 20
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 185 Watt

EPYC 8124P has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads, and 48% lower power consumption.

Xeon w3-2535, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD EPYC 8124P and Intel Xeon w3-2535.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
Intel Xeon w3-2535
Xeon w3-2535

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w3-2535 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8124P and Xeon w3-2535, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.