VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 vs EPYC 8124P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 339 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 30.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | C7-M |
| Power efficiency | 6.96 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | VIA |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Esther |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $639 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8124P and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.45 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 2x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,750 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8124P and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP6 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 3.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8124P and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8124P and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8124P and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8124P and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 3 Watt |
EPYC 8124P has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
VIA C7-M C7-M-1000, on the other hand, has 4066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8124P and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 8124P is a server/workstation processor while VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
