Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs EPYC 8124P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8124P
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
20.52
+63.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 140 Watt
12.56

EPYC 8124P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking317654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.85no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.943.79
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)29 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$639no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8124P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed2.45 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2213 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8124P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Quad-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes96no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8124P 20.52
+63.4%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 12.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8124P 36061
+63.4%
Samples: 15
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 22066
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.52 12.56
Recency 18 September 2023 29 July 2017
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 24
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 140 Watt

EPYC 8124P has a 63.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 8124P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8124P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 27 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8124P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.