Ryzen 7 1700X vs EPYC 8124P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8124P outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 329 | 980 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 29.94 | 3.03 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 17.55 | 10.00 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | 2 March 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $639 | $399 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 8124P has 888% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700X.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 1700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.45 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 16384 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 73 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,750 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 1700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 1700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | FMA3 |
| AVX | + | + |
| XFR | - | + |
| SenseMI | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 1700X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 1700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 1700X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 20.46 | 8.86 |
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 2 March 2017 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |
EPYC 8124P has a 130.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 7 1700X, on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 8124P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 8124P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 1700X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
