Ryzen 5 1300 vs EPYC 8124P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking331not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.98no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.95no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$639no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 5 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads32no data
Base clock speed2.45 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 million4800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 5 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6AM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 5 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 5 1300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 5 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 5 1300.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes96no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 8124P has 300% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 1300, on the other hand, has 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8124P and AMD Ryzen 5 1300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 8124P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 1300 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
AMD Ryzen 5 1300
Ryzen 5 1300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 17 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 5 1300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.