Xeon Gold 6554S vs EPYC 8024P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8024P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
12.81
Xeon Gold 6554S
2023
36 cores / 72 threads, 270 Watt
31.65
+147%

Xeon Gold 6554S outperforms EPYC 8024P by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking649149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.0127.26
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.6311.23
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$409$3,157

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6554S has 24% better value for money than EPYC 8024P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6554S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)36
Threads1672
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)180 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size73 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C74 °C
Number of transistors8,875 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6554S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP6FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6554S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6554S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6554S are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6554S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5 @ 5200 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6554S.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8024P 12.81
Xeon Gold 6554S 31.65
+147%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8024P 20556
Xeon Gold 6554S 50777
+147%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.81 31.65
Recency 18 September 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 36
Threads 16 72
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 270 Watt

EPYC 8024P has 200% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6554S, on the other hand, has a 147.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 350% more physical cores and 350% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6554S is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 8024P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P
Intel Xeon Gold 6554S
Xeon Gold 6554S

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6554S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6554S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.