Xeon 6333P vs EPYC 8024P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8024P
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
12.79
+9.7%
Xeon 6333P
2025
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.66

EPYC 8024P outperforms Xeon 6333P by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking687770
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.1581.64
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.506.94
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$409$319

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6333P has 269% better value for money than EPYC 8024P.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8024P and Xeon 6333P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size73 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,875 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8024P and Xeon 6333P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon 6333P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 8024P and Xeon 6333P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon 6333P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon 6333P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8024P and Xeon 6333P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8024P 12.79
+9.7%
Xeon 6333P 11.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8024P 20556
+9.6%
Xeon 6333P 18751

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.79 11.66
Recency 18 September 2023 24 February 2025
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 8024P has a 9.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Xeon 6333P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 38.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD EPYC 8024P and Intel Xeon 6333P.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8024P
EPYC 8024P
Intel Xeon 6333P
Xeon 6333P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6333P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8024P and Xeon 6333P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.