GX-210UA vs EPYC 8024P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 761 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 22.68 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 13.83 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | 23 April 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $409 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8024P and GX-210UA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 73 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,875 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8024P and GX-210UA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP6 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8024P and GX-210UA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8024P and GX-210UA are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8024P and GX-210UA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8024P and GX-210UA.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 23 April 2013 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 9 Watt |
EPYC 8024P has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
GX-210UA, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8024P and AMD GX-210UA. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 8024P is a server/workstation processor while GX-210UA is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
