Ultra X9 378H vs EPYC 8024P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 831 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.93 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Panther Lake |
| Power efficiency | 5.45 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Panther Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | 5 April 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $409 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 8024P and Core Ultra X9 378H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 12.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 18 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 2 nm |
| Die size | 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,875 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8024P and Core Ultra X9 378H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP6 | FCBGA2540 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8024P and Core Ultra X9 378H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8024P and Core Ultra X9 378H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8024P and Core Ultra X9 378H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8024P and Core Ultra X9 378H.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 5 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 2 nm |
Ultra X9 378H has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8024P and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 8024P is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra X9 378H is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
