Itanium 9150N vs EPYC 7J13
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 58 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 7.30 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | no data |
| Release date | 2021 (5 years ago) | 1 October 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7J13 and Itanium 9150N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 128 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 24 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 76 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7J13 and Itanium 9150N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | PPGA611 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7J13 and Itanium 9150N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7J13 and Itanium 9150N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7J13 and Itanium 9150N are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7J13 and Itanium 9150N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7J13 and Itanium 9150N.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 104 Watt |
EPYC 7J13 has a 1186% more advanced lithography process.
Itanium 9150N, on the other hand, has 169% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7J13 and Intel Itanium 9150N. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
