5 330 vs EPYC 7J13
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 58 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 7.30 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Wildcat Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 2021 (5 years ago) | 16 April 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7J13 and Core 5 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7J13 and Core 5 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7J13 and Core 5 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7J13 and Core 5 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7J13 and Core 5 330 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7J13 and Core 5 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7J13 and Core 5 330.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 6 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 64 | 6 |
| Threads | 128 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7J13 has 967% more physical cores and 2033% more threads.
Core 5 330, on the other hand, has a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 1767% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7J13 and Intel Core 5 330. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7J13 is a server/workstation processor while Core 5 330 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
