Intel Xeon E5-2676 V3 vs AMD EPYC 7H12

Price now 4165$
Games supported 100%
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Intel Xeon E5-2676 V3
Intel Xeon E5-2676 V3
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 37$
Games supported 99%

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rating2565
Place by popularity29no data
Value for money11.74no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Haswell-EP (2014)
Release date18 September 2019
(3 years old)
no data
Current price$4165 $37
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
no data

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm22 nm
Die size192 mm2356 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-


Information on EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
Thermal design power (TDP)280 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3, DDR42133 MHz Quad-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data


Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 81.23
Xeon E5-2676 V3 11.16
  • Passmark


Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

EPYC 7H12 100817
Xeon E5-2676 V3 13855

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E5-2676 V3 by 628% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating 81.23 11.16
Boost clock speed 3300 3000
Base clock speed 2600 2400
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 280 Watt 120 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E5-2676 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 433 ratings

Rate AMD EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 ratings

Rate Intel Xeon E5-2676 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Xeon E5-2676 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.