Processor N200 vs EPYC 7H12

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
43.84
+2710%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 2710% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking482122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency14.8224.61
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date18 September 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2.6 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache96K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.84 1.56
Recency 18 September 2019 3 January 2023
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7H12 has a 2710.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 4566.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 451 vote

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.