FX PRO-8800P vs EPYC 7H12
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 88 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 15.13 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| Release date | 18 September 2019 (6 years ago) | 2 June 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7H12 and FX PRO-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 26 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7H12 and FX PRO-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and FX PRO-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and FX PRO-8800P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and FX PRO-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R7 8CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and FX PRO-8800P.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2019 | 2 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 4 |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7H12 has an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
FX PRO-8800P, on the other hand, has 1766.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7H12 and AMD FX PRO-8800P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while FX PRO-8800P is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
