Core i5-11400F vs EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.02
+308%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 308% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking38638
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.2465.70
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$157
Current price$1970 $121 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-11400F has 195% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads12812
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache4 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.02
+308%
i5-11400F 11.04

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 308% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+308%
i5-11400F 17081

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Core i5-11400F by 308% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.02 11.04
Recency 18 September 2019 16 March 2021
Physical cores 64 6
Threads 128 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 65 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-11400F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-11400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Core i5-11400F
Core i5-11400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 7818 votes

Rate Core i5-11400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Core i5-11400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.