i5-13400F vs EPYC 7F72

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F72
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
34.44
+109%

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Core i5-13400F by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking115412
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.7657.73
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,450$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400F has 437% better value for money than EPYC 7F72.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache192 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size74 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F72 34.44
+109%
i5-13400F 16.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F72 52597
+109%
i5-13400F 25204

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7F72 1318
i5-13400F 2301
+74.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7F72 11819
+8.4%
i5-13400F 10907

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.44 16.50
Recency 14 April 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 16
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7F72 has a 108.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 140% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i5-13400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 269.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-13400F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7F72 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F72 and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F72
EPYC 7F72
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2963 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F72 or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.