Ultra 7 255HX vs EPYC 7F72
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 126 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.34 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.06 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 14 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,450 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 8 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 12 |
| Threads | 48 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 192 MB (shared) | 30 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | no data |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | FCBGA2114 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.85 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 April 2020 | 1 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 20 |
| Threads | 48 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 55 Watt |
EPYC 7F72 has 20% more physical cores and 140% more threads.
Ultra 7 255HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 336.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7F72 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 255HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F72 and Core Ultra 7 255HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
